Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Henry Vaughan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per criteria 1 of WP:SK (non-admin closure). James500 (talk) 09:43, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John Henry Vaughan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet WP:NOTABILITY criteria. Created by WP:COI WP:SPA and tagged for notability and no references for over six years, unresolved. Boleyn (talk) 08:28, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment He seems to have used "J.H. Vaughan" professionally and has, indeed, published on both the topic of birds (The Birds of Zanzibar and Pemba) and law in Zanzibar (Supplement to the Laws of Zanzibar). Whether there is enough coverage on him is another matter. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 16:37, 20 August and.2014 (UTC) These are some sources I pulled out of the intertubes: [1], [2] and [3]. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 16:51, 20 August 2014 (UTC) I added some more at the article. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 21:13, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty clear Keep a pre-Internet non-WP:BLP. Does contain claims to fame (Chief Justice of Fiji); in Who's Who [4], and had an obituary in The Times (Apr 19, 1965; pg. 10).

Nomination withdrawn Thanks for your hard work on this article, Boleyn (talk) 05:50, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.